General Managers:
They're Staying Longer, Here's Why
|
| General Managers...they're the most important person in the daily
life of thousands of private clubs across the country. They make the
club hum, they keep members happy, they balance budgets, communicate
and delegate with department heads, raise money, oversee construction
or renovations, and hopefully still find time for family life. And as
history shows, they, more often than not and for a variety of reasons,
have moved from one club to another with seeming regularity. |
| Today, times are changing! General managers are staying longer at
private clubs. Ten years ago, the average term for a general manager
at a single club was just under three years. That number has increased
to four years, nine months. In fact, some areas of the East Coast
indicate even longer terms, while some parts of the south suggest
shorter than average tenures. |
| The conclusions are based on a research survey in which private
equity, private non-equity and clubs operated by management firms were
contacted. The conclusions included: |
- General managers at clubs operated by management firms had the
shortest terms.
- GM's at equity and non-equity clubs had the next longest terms.
- General managers from equity clubs, but who are also members of
the CMAA had the longest terms.
|
| Why is it happening? Why has a GM's tenure at one club increased
to almost five years? |
| People who know the private club industry well suggest there are a
number of reasons...all good. Two major factors explain the
phenomenon, according to James B. Singerling, CCM, CEC, chief
executive officer of the Club Managers' Association of American (CMAA). |
| "First, club boards have finally begun to realize that their clubs
are a BUSINESS," he says. "Secondly, the average age of the managers
of today's clubs (CMAA members) has gone from 57 years to 44 years of
age over the past 15 years. |
| "Businesses do not ask their chief operating officer to live at
the work place. As CMAA members have become better business operators,
their ability to delegate authority to fellow management staff also
allows the COO to have a family life." |
| So there are two definitive statements...boards are finally
realizing their clubs are businesses, and their staff also needs to
have a life outside the club. For many these 'paradigms' represent a
breakthrough in how clubs operate and undoubtedly contribute to the
extended tenure of a general manager. |
| Another key factor deals with how boards relate to their general
managers right from the get-go...from the time a head hunter firm is
hired to find the right candidate through the checking of references,
annual performance evaluations, and "blue skying" about the club's
potential. |
| Another contributing factor is the clubs realize just how much it
costs to replace a senior manager. |
| "It is much smarter to work with the club's management team
through performance evaluations to enhance their performance, rather
than terminating staff," says Singerling. "The numbers regarding
average tenure that have been promoted by some industry vendors had
little basis in fact. Industry studies that showed reduced years on
the job in the last decade reflected the entire CMAA membership,
including assistant managers, clubhouse managers, general managers and
chief operating officers. |
| "In theory, most assistant managers are encouraged to move through
multiple positions during the early years of their careers to gain
experience. This overall movement of this segment of the CMAA
membership skews the "average time on the job" reporting. The true
general managers/COOs have always retained their positions for many
years longer...it has to do with smarter boards of directors seeing
the value of a talented professional and making sure that their COO
cannot afford to leave. The salary paid to senior management comes
back to the club many-fold through an efficient operation and a higher
quality staff. It is just good business sense to compensate good staff
and retain them." And therein lies much of the story. |
| Gregg Patterson has been general manager of The Beach Club of
Santa Monica for 21 years. He suggests the Rule of Five is a reason
that keeps a GM on the job. |
| "The Rule of Five has always been applicable - it takes five years
for a new manager to truly know their club, the politics, the people,
the facility, the employee team, the norms and the possibilities," he
says. "To have a lasting impact, the manager needs to know the
membership and their wants, needs and expectation and to figure out
how best to deliver the most product to the greatest number of people
with the least possible expense to the club. To do that they (the GM)
need a relationship, and substantive relationships take years to
establish. The more years a strong manager is in place, the more
satisfying it is for them and the more successful is the relationship
for the members." A point well made by Patterson's lengthy tenure at
The Beach Club. |
| So what's the impetus for this increased longevity? Jay DiPietro,
CCM, president/COO and general manager of Boca West Country Club
credits "better training and education by the CMAA....Today's manager
have a better understanding of their members' needs." |
| Dick Kopplin, president of Kopplin Search, Inc., an executive
search company based in Scottsdale, Az., agrees with this assessment
and adds "I may sound partisan but I truly believe one of the primary
reasons that tenure continues to improve in the private club world is
because both club search committees and headhunters are doing a better
job of matching the candidates to the clubs. Too often, in the past, a
manager would accept a job at a new club without really evaluating the
opportunity in a thorough fashion. Correspondingly, the search
committee would not recognize the importance of the "right fit" as
they reviewed candidates. Thankfully, that is changing." |
| John Sibbald, president of John Sibbald Associates, an executive
search firm from St. Louis, MO, is in agreement. |
| "Clubs are relying more on professional search firms in
identifying and recruiting managers who have "both the technical
skills to do the job, but even more importantly, the cultural
compatibility with clubs membership and staff," he says. "A search
firm takes the time and possesses the expertise to seek out the right
individual to make a match that works for both parties." |
| Sibbald says longevity is good news for clubs since there is
stable, familiar leadership for both members and staff. Other benefits
range from having a continuing management philosophy allowing greater
continuity of programs and projects to developing staff loyalty and
reducing turnover. |
| Kopplin suggests there are two positive results. "First, it allows
for continuity in management philosophy. That in turn will provide for
better staff retention and increased member recognition all the way
through the club. And second, the general manager has the opportunity
to properly "condition" the leaders of the club i.e. board members. I
mean "conditioning" in a positive way. The more time the general
manager can work with the leadership of the club and the probable
future president, the better the dynamic will be with the manager and
the president as they work through a variety of governance issues." |
| It's Sibbald's opinion and others in the industry that a change in
club leadership is always an uncertain time for any club. But stable
leadership at the top means there is vastly better continuity of
programs and leadership. Even though he agrees longevity is a good
thing, change for many reasons, may be inevitable...and maybe for the
best of the club, its members and the manager. |
| "In our experience, a club manager, until he or she is in their
mid-50's or so in age, should not stay more than 10 years at any
club," Sibbald opined. "The reason for this is that clubs Ð like the
extended families that they are - go through major social and cultural
changes. The manager who was perfect for a club a decade ago may not
be the right manager for that same club today. Also, managers
themselves often benefit from a fresh new work environment. Then too,
clubs, unlike most private sector enterprises, can't grow markedly in
revenues and memberships. An ambitious manager on his or her way up in
their career is going to expect average or above-average competitive
salary and benefits. Oftentimes, the only way these needs can be met
is by a move to a larger, better paying club. Consequently, job
movement for this reason is both good for the club and its manager." |
| The Beach Club's Patterson believes the reasons for longevity are
many. |
- Better placement as a result of more informed boards and more
informed managers.
- The use of "head hunting" firms who specialize in finding the
right club culture for the right person.
- A more sophisticated manager community that is better able to
deal with a sophisticated membership and the complexities of the
operation.
- An acceptance by managers that "jumping around" is disruptive to
quality of life and that quality of life is worth a lot more than a
few extra dollars.
- And two career households which make the casual "exit" from a
job by one of the spouses more complicated, since the second needs
to uproot their career as well.
|
| In the minds of both managers and industry experts, education,
professional development programs and exposure to professionals from
many industries has contributed more and better qualified people and
thus longer tenures at clubs. Much of the credit goes to the CMAA. |
| "Education and exposure makes managers more sophisticated in both
the hard and soft (people issues) sciences, thereby increasing the
possibility that they'll be a success at any given club," suggests
Patterson. "Industry experience, reflective opportunities, structured
education, developed curiosities - all have contributed to the growing
success and increased longevity of contemporary club managers." |
| Sibbald adds that "there is no professional society or association
in any line of work that has done as fine a job in the professional
development of its members than CMAA. And they (the CMAA) just keep
getting better and more resourceful about it. The end result of such
development is a better-trained manager: Multi-functional in skills,
and technologically up-to-date. Such individuals are far less likely
to fail on the job." |
| So if there are benefits to members, clubs and staff, do clubs
really become more efficient the longer a managers stays in one place? |
| "Clubs often become more efficient the longer a manager stays
because they come to know the club's systems and the talent needed to
make those systems work at their highest efficiency," says Patterson.
"This is true up to a point, that is, up to a number of years when
managers feel comfortable with their operation, feel less challenged
by the membership or committees or board and tend to grow less driven
to improve." |
| Kopplin says his experience working with private clubs "tells me
the big three will always be the dominant factors in creating greater
longevity for a general manager. |
| 1) Financial ability. One of the best ways a manager
can develop trust with a private club board of directors is to
demonstrate financial knowledge and business acumen. |
| 2)Professional visibility. An outstanding general
manager will always have a sense of where they need to be. Good
visibility does not always mean being in the dining room. In fact, it
may be knowing when to spend the day in the office or being on the
golf course or being seen in the pro shop or even at the delivery
dock. |
| 3) Communication. The best surprise is no surprise.
Most tenured general managers will admit to "over-communicating" with
a new club president until they find a level of understanding, which
is comfortable for both. |
| Publisher's final thoughts |
| Longevity is happening, all of which is good for the private club
industry. The fact many boards of directors are treating their clubs
as a business, is a step in the right direction. It's also a positive
in that clubs are tapping talent, often through executive search
firms, best for their club. Boards and search committees are meeting
and asking the right questions of the right candidate. The "right" fit
in the first instance, combined with continuing professional
development, positive performance appraisals and firm leadership
undoubtedly are contributing factors for longer, productive terms for
general managers. |
| If clubs wants a general manager with current thinking and an
understanding of the industry today, and the general manger wants
longevity, it's my belief education is the Number One priority. It's
important that boards budget for continuing education and encourage
their general manager to seek appropriate educational opportunities.
|
| Clubs benefits from longevity because the relationships between
manager and members are stronger; members and staff understand the
club's vision; the club community grows and prospers and replacing the
general manager is a thing of the past. |
| At least, that's the way I see it! |
| |
| |
John Fornaro
Publisher |